There is an opportunity for me to chase this weird dream, but I shouldn’t do it.
For decades I’ve adored this urbanist ideal of living in an apartment above a shop in a busy stretch of the city, where I am in the thick of it, making a home in a bustling zone of commerce and traffic. One such opportunity has opened up — but I shouldn’t take it.
I’ve had my eye on this weird flatiron-style apartment above a secondhand shop, uphill from the cafe I’ve called my 3rd space for twenty years, and at the other end of the building from the bar I’ve called my 4th space for five. Suddenly, all the curtains are down and it’s now unoccupied. It’s on the market. On the market!
Now I’m floating these weird fantasies of renting it as a second home, where I can have a place to crawl to after a night out, where I can bring friends to, where I can set up my music gear and create without bothering neighbors, where I can get away for a bit with less consequence. But I don’t want to let go of my current apartment, which is cozy, quiet, and has been mine for the past 6 years.
So I would have to half-time it between here and there. And double-time it with furniture and other stuff I’d need to support my life. Two bars of soap. Two sets of kitchen pans. Two microwaves. Two couches. Two bedroom sets. Two Internet bills. Two of everything for as long as I held both leases.
This apartment is between an anarchist bookstore that throws punk shows on one side and a convenience store with a busy taco stand on the other. It’s loud, it’s brash, it’s hot, it’s cold, it’s poorly insulated. It’s hostile to restfulness. The parking is bad. The property crime is elevated. The nearby intersection is hectic and crash-prone.
Half-time indeed.
Honestly, I love this idea, but I also hate this idea on two grounds:
It’s a weird flex: having two apartments, in a city where housing is hard to find, not only makes me part of the problem, but an architect of the problem. I don’t want to pass this up, but I also don’t want to pay double for housing and be on the hook for the duration of both leases should something happen to my standard of living (I place no trust in my future employment). That spot should go to someone more deserving.
Not thinking big enough: this place and my current apartment are only one neighborhood away from each other. I’d love to once again live in this other neighborhood. It’s nice. But if I’m renting two places, why not be more geographically distant? Why not do the snowbird / sunbird thing and split time between locales where the weather’s different enough to be fulfilling?
I really, really should not call and look at the place. That would be foolish. So foolish. These stupid fantasies are going to be the ruin of me.
Flex is ruin.
